| |
Project
Description
Sandia
National Laboratories and the Utton Center partnered
to provide technical assistance and facilitation to the Middle
Rio Grande Water Assembly. SNL helped members of the
Water Assembly develop a computer based simulation model tailored
to aid the Assembly with regional water planning and the decision-making
process. The Utton Transboundary Resources Center at the University
of New Mexico School of Law collaborated with SNL and the Assembly
by providing active facilitation to members of the model development
team. The Utton Center was also available to provide legal analysis
and administrative support throughout the planning process.
The focus of the collaboration was to plan and develop the model.
A core modeling team, composed of Assembly members, met throughout
the spring and summer of 2002 to identify the primary actions and
physical components for model analysis. The meeting process began with an educational focus on the capabilities of the model,
and intensive discussion as the model team identified scenarios
for evaluation. The model construction reflected the results
of the modeling team discussions. Ultimately, the model design
provided a decision support tool equipped to evaluate alternative
water management strategies. In addition, the model was designed
to serve as an educational tool for presentation to the general
public.
Utton Center Role
The Utton Center's role was to streamline the model development
process and assist the modeling team in maximizing their productivity
during meetings. The model team identified data and information
necessary to incorporate into the model. In addition, the team
identified several scenarios for analysis and compared the relative
merits and deficiencies of each scenario. The facilitation process
was instrumental throughout this endeavor as the team worked
to establish methods, procedures, and criteria for measuring and
evaluating the relative desirability and effectiveness of the scenarios.
A second important component of the facilitation process occured
in conjunction with the public outreach portion of the water planning
process. Community conversations are public meetings designed to
gather feedback and generate discussion. The model
was presented during a series of conversations, both to educate the
public about the complexity of the planning process and to gather
comments. Later in the process the scenarios were presented to
the public through the community conversations. As in the model
team meetings, the active participation of a skilled facilitator
fostered effective participation and greatly improved the productivity
of public outreach meetings.
Group Consensus Report
What if there is no consensus...
It is crucial that you have agreement on your fall back steps before
you begin your process of seeking consensus, and that the consequences
of not reaching consensus are clear. Be sure you know:
- what we will do failing consensus
- how the decision will be made if consensus fails
Final efforts to reach consensus can include:
take the issue apart, and see if there is consensus on part of
it
- ask the dissenting party or parties to create language which
they think will be acceptable to the others
- identify additional information needs, and assign that data
search to one or more parties
- ask parties to check with their constituents for guidance, clarification,
or creative ideas
- form a small group of the dissenters and one or two others to
try to find a solution
As a last resort, you can admit there is no consensus, and:
- agree to disagree, and file minority and majority reports on
the issue
- if a decision is required to move forward, vote with at least
90% required to pass, and minority report required from the dissenter(s)
Cooperative Modeling Team Meeting
Minutes
Technical
Documentation
Sandia Model Documentation
An Exploration of Innovative Technologies for Active Water
Management
|
|